🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". The policy may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not enact binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," said one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and fit for children," said a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations take a more measured tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the actions of this nation and its followers show that states globally are less and less prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.